Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amy's avatar

Hi - I'm a 70 y/o woman with osteoporosis - is it too late for me too help myself besides taking meds for bone density? If you have any suggestions please lmk. I'm envious of the younger generation's options!

Suzanne Dixon's avatar

I see a lot of content online suggesting most (all?) women should take MHT to reduce risk of cardiovascular disease, dementia, diabetes, etc. The only solid evidence I have seen on the benefits of MHT suggest it can do exactly TWO things. 1. Manage symptoms of menopause including hot flashes, night sweats, insomnia, GSM, possibly aches and pains associated with decreased connective tissue elasticity, and a few other things. 2. Reduce osteoporosis risk.

Data, as of today, are equivocal regarding the possibility that MHT can reduce risk of dementia, heart disease, and other chronic conditions associated with advancing age.

If a woman has no menopause symptoms, no hot flashes, no insomnia, is there any reason she should take MHT? Weighing the modest increased risk of breast cancer against the as-yet-to-be-proven benefits for other chronic conditions, my takeaway is, "no, a woman without menopause symptoms and who is at average risk of osteoporosis should not take MHT."

Despite this, I feel constant pressure that I am going to 'miss out,' regret, or otherwise damage my long-term health by NOT taking MHT. Why is there so much pressure and so many people pushing MHT?

Don't get me wrong, I saw the incalculable damage to women's health when the WHI scared women away from any MHT options. That study was poorly designed, and thankfully, medical science has caught up and is correcting the record on that. But, gosh, the drumbeat of TAKE MHT is pretty crazy right now.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?